/*CUSTOMIZATIONS*/

CNN Is a Fake News Organization With a Feminist Culture


CNN presents itself as a factual news and information organization. In reality, it is a political organization that promotes its own agenda in the form of biased news segments and articles.

For example, CNN reported on a Harvard study that claimed female doctors are better than male doctors.  The organization stated "When a patient goes to the best hospital, he or she usually hopes for a doctor who is knowledgeable and experienced. Something else to wish for? A woman physician. That's because female doctors may on average be better than their male counterparts at treating patients in the hospital and keeping them healthy long-term, according to findings published Monday in JAMA Internal Medicine." They also used the study to promote higher pay for women stating "With such incentives in play, hospitals may now see more value in female doctors -- who, research has found, are consistently paid less than their male counterparts and less likely to get promoted." More of their propaganda can be read here.

CNN's newscast discussing the study similarly promoted female supremacy. However, an activist, Lucian V├ólsan, researched the actual study and discovered both CNN's and Harvard's conclusions were a farce. His detailed video review of the newscast is 18 minutes long. However, readers only wanting an analysis of the study's data can advance Lucian’s video to the 9:30 mark. 

Lucian's analysis shows that patient mortality rates for male and female doctors are very similar. The difference is less than 1% in every case except for Sepsis. Similarly, Lucian's analysis shows that readmission rates for patient's treated by female and male doctors are comparable.  The difference ranges from 0% to 1.1% for all medical conditions researched. These differences are small and within statistical error. The small statistical differences could be attributed to researcher bias - which was extremely intense. None of this of course was discussed by CNN.

Also, during CNN's newscast discussing the study, they displayed the phrase "ANYONE SURPRISED (WINK)" across the bottom of the screen. This phrase is symbolic of the network’s female supremacist mentality - especially among its women reporters. This is exactly why the term 'feminazi' was coined. These feminist reporters see themselves as superior to men.

The purpose of CNN's Harvard study newscast was to promote the network's feminist ideology of female superiority.

Another example of CNN as a political organization comes from WikiLeaks. Various emails reveal the organization colluded with Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in devising ways to undermine her opponents credibility.

An email written by CNN consultant and Democratic Party National Committee (DNC) operative Donna Brazile states:

"Subject: One of the questions directed to HRC tomorrow is from a woman with a rash"
"Her family has lead poison and she will ask what, if anything, will Hillary do as president to help the ppl of Flint. Folks, I did a service project today. It's so tragic. And what's worse, some homes have not been tested and it's important to encourage seniors to also get tested. "

The email was sent to multiple Clinton staffers before Hillary Clinton’s debate against Bernie Sanders hosted by CNN. It would let Hillary prepare for a known debate question while Sanders would remain unaware of his debate questions. This would make Sanders appear less prepared for the debate than Hillary thus undermining Sanders credibility as a leader.

CNN used a somewhat similar strategy in their efforts to undermine another Hillary opponent, Donald Trump. The news organization coordinated with the DNC on how to question Trump during interviews. An email from  DNC Research Director Lauren Dillon to fellow DNC colleagues states:

"Wolf Blitzer [CNN reporter] is interviewing Trump on Tues ahead of his foreign policy address on Wed. Please send me thoughts by 10:30 AM tomorrow."

DNC staffer Kelly Roberts sent back 11 different questions she and others had composed. They are shown here.

Another email shows CNN sent a representative, Dan Merica,  to John Podesta's (chairman of Hillary's presidential campaign) home for a secret dinner party that was supposed to be off the record.  The email states:

"Here is the current RSVP list to the Thursday Night (4/9) dinner at Podesta’s. "  There were representatives from multiple news organizations for the 'off the record' affair.

These emails show CNN was not objectively reporting actual election news. Instead, it was attempting to manipulate the outcome of the presidential election.

Another example of CNN promoting its own agenda thru biased news segments comes from its article titled  "You participated in the Women's March. Now what?" 

The 'news' article did not even try to be objective. Instead, it was incoherent political propaganda imploring people to protest President Trump. Oddly, the article made the statement "Research shows that female lawmakers tend to push policies that support women and families and work across the aisle, according to the United State of Women, a partner in the Women's March on Washington." Thus, according to a feminist group, female lawmakers tend to be sexist. They have little interest in men and boys. Their only concern is women. Sen Kirsten Gillibrand (NY) is an example on one such lawmaker.

Another article titled  "Women'smarch: Cathartic moment or enduring movement?" gave only a vague description of the different groups attending the protest. However, research reveals, the women's groups attending the protest had their own special interests. There were groups such as the Center for Health and Gender Equity ( advocates for a foreign policy that is woman-centered), Association of Black Women Attorneys ( a legal  association developed by and for black women), EMILY’s List (funds only Democratic Party female candidates),  The Autonomous Womyn’s Front (a kind of women's Klu Klux Klan), Empower HER Business ( a Christian business women's group), Black Women’s Roundtable (championing just and equitable public policy for Black women), Feminist Majority Foundation ( a female chauvinist organization) and, oddly, the  Council on American-Islamic Relations (a group with direct links to the violent anti Semite group HAMAS). The only idea which unified the different feminist organizations was their sexism and hatred towards men.

Additionally, CNN hid infighting between feminist organizations from the public. For example, a number of black feminists wanted white women to “understand their privilege". One wrote "What will this organization do when all eyes are on them? Will they continue to tread the well-worn path of white feminism to the exclusion of others?"

CNN's purpose in creating the vague article was to urge feminist solidarity against men.

A final example of CNN promoting its own agenda comes from its news show "The Situation Room". A segment aired January 18, 2017 with host Wolf Blitzer and contributor Brian Todd theorizing about President Donald Trump and Vice President Mike Pence being blown up on inauguration day. An American news service does not theorize about American presidents being blown up. These are the actions of an extremist totalitarian political group.

CNN is not a real news organization. It does not broadcast stories based on factual objective views. In reality, CNN is a political group. It promotes its own political agenda in the form of biased and fraudulent news segments which typically omit unfavorable facts. Often, these segments project the network's feminist ideology of female superiority.

January 30, 2017

Sexism, Corruption and Totalitarianism Was Defeated In America's Historic 2016 Election

Those who represented sexism, corruption and totalitarianism were beaten in America's shocking 2016 election.

Hillary Clinton was a candidate who represented sexism. As detailed in a recent post, she planned an administration based on sexism. Hillary intended to enact rules making false rape accusations easier thereby making the expulsion of male students from college easier. She also planned on marginalizing male workers and had no interesting in representing male citizens whatsoever. Her sexist polices mirrored that of many major news organizations such as the New York Times, CBSNews, YahooNews and others. This is one of the reasons why most large news outlets endorsed her.

The election also revealed widespread fraud and corruption within the American media. Major News organizations claim they are factual and objective. However, the 2016 election showed they were biased and corrupt. WikiLeaks emails revealed CNN colluded with the Hillary Clinton campaign in devising questions to ask rival candidate Donald Trump in an upcoming interview. CNN's intent was to undermine Trump's credibility and make Hillary appear thoughtful. Wikileaks also exposed similar collusion between the Hillary Campaign and the New York Times. Emails showed the newspaper crafted its articles, in coordination with the Hillary campaign so that they projected Hillary in a positive light while simultaneously emplacing any of Trumps errors.

Other American major news outlets were also fraudulent in their reporting. For example, after voting was completed YahooNews wrote a story claiming "Many liberal and moderate Americans" were protesting against Trump’s election. The article implied the vast majority of Americans wanted the voting results overturned. In fact, only violent left wing extremists were protesting. Most Americans accepted the democratic results just as they have always done in past referendums. However, after the 2016 voting results, far left wing totalitarians, began assaulting people and destroying property. The protestors oppose free speech and are intolerant of other opinions. An example of their violent and totalitarian mentality is here.

Additionally, other examples occurred in Indianapolis, where left wing crowds chanted 'kill the police' while in Portland left wing riots occurred causing a fair amount of property damage and in Washington, D.C these protesters held up a sign "RAPE MELANIA”. The sign was in reference to Melania Trump, the president elects wife.

Major news organizations such as NBC, CBS, New York Times and YahooNews covered up or minimized much of the violence perpetrated by the far left protesters. The reason for this cover up is that most American journalists represent the far left. They believe in the same violent, intolerant mentality as the left wing protesters. American journalists do not tolerate opposing views. They smear and misrepresent anyone or organization they disagree with.

As an example, in a TIME Magazine article, a reporter smeared mens rights activists as right wing extremists, claimed anyone not liking the female Ghostbusters was a right wing troll and asserted men questioning feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian's philosophy are sexist. He used isolated incidents to smear anyone he disagrees with as a 'white male Nazi'. The reporter concluded the internet is being overrun by trolls.

In reality, this far left wing journalist was angry that internet bloggers were stating opinions that were not identical to his own. He wants to stamp out all views that do not mirror his own.

Here lies the true historical nature of the 2016 election. Nearly all of the mass media smeared Hillary Clinton's opponents. There was no objectivity whatsoever concerning campaign coverage. ABCNews, CBSNews, NBCNews, YahooNewss, New York Times, Washington Post, CNN and other outlets regularly produced articles smearing both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump as sexist, incompetent and extremists. Meanwhile, Hillary was portrayed as an sincere, insightful leader. Despite this lengthy propaganda campaign from large news networks, THEIR CANDIDATE LOST. The media was defeated by the internet. Bloggers and websites circumvented traditional news outlets and broke their monopoly on information. News organizations were exposed as corrupt while their journalists were unmasked as totalitarian. For the first time in American history, citizens effectively challenged media claims.

America's November election destroyed the last vestiges of media credibility and integrity. Journalists are no longer trusted. They are seen as spin doctors promoting their own intolerance.

Those who wanted a U.S. administration based on sexism and those who practiced corruption and intolerance were beaten in the 2016 presidential election

November 29, 2016

Hillary Rodham Clinton Will Be a Sexist President If Elected

Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is campaigning on policies showing her administration will be based on sexism. She does not view all Americans as equal.

For example, Hillary claims there is a rape culture on college campus and that she plans on doing something about it. Her presidential campaign website states she will:
"Provide comprehensive support to survivors"
"Ensure a fair process for all. Too often, the process of addressing a sexual assault on campus is confusing and convoluted. Many who choose to report sexual assault in the criminal justice system fear that their voices will be dismissed instead of heard."
"Increasing prevention efforts : We should increase sexual violence prevention education programs that cover issues like consent and bystander intervention and make sure we have programs not only in college but also in secondary school"

Thus Ms. Clinton will support ‘survivors’ (typically women) but not the accused (typically men). Accused students are assumed guilty. Additionally, she believes students claiming they were sexually assaulted should be heard but those being accused should be silenced. Lastly, she wants an increase in white knight culture. According to her bystander plan, men should fight any man if a women implicates him of any sexual indiscretion. Her administration will view female students as important and male students as sexual abusers.

She supports her plan by stating “An estimated one in five women reports being sexually assaulted while in college.”

Her website goes on to say

“Hillary has led efforts to address violence against women her entire career. Hillary supported the creation of the Department of Justice’s Office on Violence Against Women. As senator, Hillary co-sponsored the 2005 reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act.” “As secretary of state, Hillary rallied the international community to take collective action to end violence against women.”
Thus, in her entire career, she has done nothing about violence against men. Nor does she consider violence against men by women as an issue of any significance. This reveals her feminist mentality that grown adult women should not be held accountable for their actions and that men are not equal to women. Greater detail of her views are presented here.

Her presidential campaign website also states

“America has taken tremendous strides when it comes to expanding opportunity for women—but many women still face barriers to entering and advancing in the workforce, and the ability of women to make their own health decisions is under assault. Hillary believes that issues that affect women’s lives are family issues, economic issues, and crucial to our future competitiveness. She has been fighting for women and girls her entire career, and she’s just getting started"
"As president, Hillary will: Work to close the pay gap. Women earn less than men across our economy—and women of color often lose out the most. We should promote pay transparency across the economy and work to pass the Paycheck Fairness Act—a bill Hillary introduced as senator—to give women the tools they need to fight discrimination in the workforce."

Hillary does not believe men’s lives are family and economic issues which are crucial to the country’s future competiveness. Her focus will be on women. Over the past three decades men’s participation in America’s labor force has steadily declined. Their ability to find permanent employment has decreased. PEW Research states “the labor market trajectory of males in the U.S. has turned downward along four dimensions: skills acquisition; employment rates; occupational stature; and real wage levels.”  Hillary has no plans to address this issue. Its not relevant to her. In her own words, she has been fighting ONLY for ‘women and girls her entire career’. Her female centric plan is shown here.

Ms. Clinton also demands women in general be paid more money. Her plan for raising women’s wages is detailed here.

Lastly, Hillary’s foreign policy will be based on feminism. Her website states:
She declared to the world that women’s rights are human rights".
"As secretary of state, Hillary worked to bring down barriers that stop women and girls from reaching their potential. She championed programs to advance women’s economic participation, address gender-based violence, and elevate the status of women and girls around the world.”
"Hillary created the first ever ambassador-at-large for global women’s issues—now a permanent position within the State Department—to ensure that women’s issues are always at the cornerstone of our country’s foreign policy."
Under Hillary, American foreign policy will not be based on the security and economic advancement of the country. Instead, it will be based on the status of women in foreign territory. Additionally, Ms. Clinton has no program advancing men’s economic participation nor addressing gender based violence against men anywhere in the world. Men’s rights are not seen as human rights neither abroad nor at home. More of her administration’s proposed focus is seen here.

Much of Ms. Clinton’s domestic and foreign policies will be based on how they affect women. American men are simply an afterthought. This is why she stated on MSNBC March 14, 2016
“We’ve got to continue to support the Libyan people to give them a chance. Because, otherwise, you see what’s happened in Syria with the consequences of millions of people flooding out of Syria, with more than 250,000 people killed, with terrorist groups like ISIS taking up a huge swath of territory as big as some of the states in the area. Libya was a different kind of calculation and we didn’t lose a single person.”
Libya has become a mess because of her lack of foresight concerning the country’s chaos after Gaddafi’s elimination. Furthermore, we did lose people!. Four Americans were killed when their consulate in Benghazi was stormed by terrorists. Since all those lost were men, it did not register on Hillary’s feminist brain that they were of any significance.

Hillary Clinton views herself as a representative of female voters – particularly white suburban female voters. She simply doesn’t represent men. That’s why she has no plan to address false rape accusations on college campuses. She also has no plan addressing low male college graduation rates nor a plan reversing the downward trend of men’s employment in the labor market. She has no interest in helping men obtain new job skills for the changing economy. She has no intention of altering the anti-male family court system nor enacting any type of paternity fraud legislation. Her interest is in women ONLY. She is a feminist.

For men, Hillary Clinton is not the answer. In fact, her sexist mentality is part of the problem.

October 27, 2016